Meta in talks for settlement in addiction lawsuit: fine could reach $1.4 trillion

Meta is discussing a possible settlement in the high-profile lawsuit brought against it by 29 US states, according to a Bloomberg report. At this stage, there is no further information on the status of the negotiations, and Meta and the states leading the lawsuit have not responded to the report.

The trial, which began last week, focuses on claims that the tech giant designed Facebook and Instagram to be addictive for adolescent users. The trial is part of the "addiction lawsuits," a term for thousands of claims filed by private plaintiffs, families, and school districts in the US against social media platforms — Meta, TikTok, YouTube, and Snap — alleging they were designed to cause user addiction, particularly among the young, leading to mental and other harm.

The current lawsuit is led by the attorneys general of California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey. They claim that Meta violated their states' laws by designing Facebook and Instagram to encourage compulsive behavior and prolonged use by young users, while creating a false impression regarding their safety. The broader group of 29 states is suing Meta on the grounds that the company violated a federal law protecting children online by, among other things, collecting their information without parental consent. A violation of the law carries a fine of $20,000 per violation — a sum that could grow significantly considering that Facebook and Instagram have millions of minor users and the activity of each could include a large number of violations.

According to Meta's own analysis, the fine imposed on the company could reach $1.4 trillion.

Yesterday, Tuesday, the head of Instagram, Adam Mosseri, testified in court, claiming that the platform had strengthened its protections for young users, but admitted that these changes did not reduce the volume of their use of the application.

"There is no silver bullet for such problems," he said.

Before Mosseri, Francesco Pogo, Instagram's product design director, took the witness stand and was asked by the attorney for the states whether Meta launched features like "Take a Break" and "Sleep Mode" on an opt-in model because the company knew this model was much less effective than an opt-out model. Pogo agreed with the attorney's statement that he understands that people use tools less if they are not enabled by default.

In the first week of the trial, former Meta executive Arturo Bejar testified, stating that Meta had identified "a significant number of harms, including harms to young people," but did not make changes following the findings. He also testified that Meta presented data to the public that downplayed the extent of teenagers' exposure to violent or difficult content. According to him, the company reported that the risk of teenagers being exposed to such content was 0.01% to 0.02%, even though surveys it conducted itself and did not publish indicated a rate 100 to 400 times higher than the published figure.