Equal Custody Ends Child Support Obligations in Landmark Family Court Ruling
A Family Court in Kiryat Gat dismissed a mother's child support claim, ruling that equal custody and identical earning capacities mean parents should split expenses equally.

When family life takes a turn, finances often become the ultimate battleground. The Family Court in Kiryat Gat recently delivered a fascinating ruling that reflects a modern approach to divorce and shared parenting, dismissing a mother's demand for 7,600 shekels in monthly child support and housing expenses.
A Shift in Custody and Financial Reality
Initially, after the couple separated, the children lived primarily with their mother, and the father was ordered to pay temporary child support. However, the dynamic shifted significantly when the Rabbinical Court approved an equal custody arrangement where the children spend half their time with each parent. Following this change, the father asked to cancel the child support payments, arguing that each parent should cover the children's needs while in their respective homes.
The mother, a nail technician and tattoo artist, argued that her income is minimal and requested substantial monthly support and housing contributions. She claimed her ex-husband earns undisclosed extra income. However, Judge Diana Paso-Vago ruled that both parents possess an identical earning capacity, paving the way for a groundbreaking financial balance.
"Common sense dictates that running an independent business for years at a wage that does not even touch the minimum wage would lead a person to reevaluate their occupation and seek to increase their income and welfare," noted Judge Paso-Vago.
Equal Earning Capacity and Shared Responsibility
The court determined that the mother's reported income did not reflect her true potential, especially given the equal custody arrangement which frees up significant time for her to expand her business. Consequently, the judge set both parents' earning capacity at an identical net amount of 14,100 shekels. Because custody and financial capabilities are now completely equal, the court ruled that neither parent will pay monthly child support, while educational and medical expenses will be split down the middle.





